The history of textile import control systems dates back to 1935, when the franklin D. Roosevelt government struck a so-called «friendly and voluntary» agreement with Japan to limit heavy shipments of cotton products to the United States, then the most important textile category. The issue of controlling import volumes for certain important products, in order to improve the financial health of the main domestic industries and reduce losses. American jobs have again been a live theme in recent weeks for a number of reasons. The largest has been underway since the end of the year to conclude renewed agreements with almost a number of countries to limit textile deliveries to the United States. Voluntary restraint agreements and orderly marketing agreements are considered shadow measures and have been banned by the World Trade Organization since 1995. All measures of grey areas active at the time were abandoned until 1999.  Orderly marketing agreements also focus on the difference between binding and non-binding agreements. orderly marketing agreements are included in voluntary restraint agreements; However, voluntary restraint agreements can also refer to trade agreements between industries and governments. The Consumers` Union distinguishes between binding and non-binding agreements between the government and government agreements. The impact on national and international law varies between binding and non-binding agreements. An agreement could cause problems with national law, but not with international law or vice versa. The desire for orderly marketing modalities has increased due to the increasing pressure exerted by the constant evolution of import and world trade models, which has made the organization of orderly marketing agreements a political instrument.
If no agreement is negotiated, the importing country can pursue a more unilateral trade policy.  With the different results obtained through orderly marketing. It seems clear that they alone are not the panacea for serious import problems. A government official said they might need to be combined with other actions, as in the case of the shoe, to do a lot of good. Given that the number of U.S. industries facing import competition is not decreasing, the government may face a difficult problem in finding the answers in a comprehensive policy that wants to steer it toward trade liberalization. An orderly marketing agreement is a non-legal treaty concluded by the national government, which stipulates that a sovereign state must refrain from exporting goods to a sovereign state that negotiates in a targeted manner. These agreements directly concern voluntary export restrictions, safeguard and avoidance clauses. . .